Andrew Campling <andrew.campling@419.consulting> writes:

>it should be possible to communicate clearly to implementers and others the
>relative positions of TLS 1.2, TLS-LTS and TLS 1.3 with reference RFC 9325
>and any other relevant documents etc.

Makes sense, I'd have no problems doing that, although as mentioned for RFC
9325 I'd prefer to reference it as "further advice" to avoid confusion over
the fact that a lot of it covers things that don't exist in -LTS.  I'm open to
suggestions on how to handle this, maybe it's nothing to be concerned about.

Peter.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- tls@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to tls-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to