Any further news on this? I thought the wglc was expected very shortly after 
118 and suddenly we're pretty close to 119.  GitHub has been pretty quiet too, 
with no movement on the four open issues since mid-November?  Is it just 
general workload or is something else affecting progress?  

Andrew

-----Original Message-----
From: Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 6:46 PM
To: TLS List <tls@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [TLS] Late holiday gifts

Hi! We are circling back with the authors and expect a revised draft soon-ish. 
And yes, I am being vague about the actual time frame.

spt

> On Jan 21, 2024, at 11:02, Arnaud Taddei 
> <arnaud.taddei=40broadcom....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> +1
>  
> From: TLS <tls-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Stephen Farrell 
> <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie>
> Date: Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 21:56
> To: Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai....@dmarc.ietf.org>, tls@ietf.org 
> <tls@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [TLS] Late holiday gifts
> 
> 
> 
> On 18/01/2024 17:46, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > Per last IETF meeting [1] I thought ECH was going to go to WGLC.  Were we 
> > waiting for a new draft?  Something else?
> 
> Looking a bit like we're an errata-only mailing list last while:-)
> 
> Processing those is of course worthy (probably) but so is finishing 
> existing specs that've been deployed already.
> 
> So yeah, I agree WGLC would be timely.
> 
> S.
> 
> > 
> > [1] 
> > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minute
> > s-118-tls-202311060830/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1706216217000000&usg=A
> > OvVaw3QUgJKQAvNUkaabvM22r89
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > TLS mailing list
> > TLS@ietf.org
> > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/t
> > ls&source=gmail-imap&ust=1706216217000000&usg=AOvVaw3-F_G6Ng12eiZL6-
> > bz5-IZ
> 
> This electronic communication and the information and any files 
> transmitted with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are 
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
> addressed and may contain information that is confidential, legally 
> privileged, protected by privacy laws, or otherwise restricted from 
> disclosure to anyone else. If you are not the intended recipient or 
> the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to the intended 
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, copying, 
> distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this 
> e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error, 
> please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, 
> and destroy any printed copy of 
> it._______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls


_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to