> The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61) [0]. > We need to start working through these at some point.
This spreadsheet is probably more useful for people who want to help out, since only the ADs can really make conclusions as I understand it. (Errata process doesn't seem to be documented; I'll post to RSWG about that) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1nmuRTV0Fwx-p13AMSV5GMZP5QCn80K0T5Oht5d8Putw/edit#gid=133722335 The green color-coding means someone updated the item, IIRC, but I don't remember the details. [0] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2&area_acronym=sec&wg_acronym=TLS&presentation=table _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
