> On Jan 18, 2024, at 15:56, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>
> Processing those is of course worthy (probably) but so is finishing
> existing specs that've been deployed already.
The TLS WG holds the distinction for have the most reported errata (61) [0].
We need to start working through these at some point.
spt
[0]
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rec_status=2&area_acronym=sec&wg_acronym=TLS&presentation=table
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
