Perhaps we could rewrite this text so that it reflects that we think this is non-ideal.?
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 9:16 AM Salz, Rich <rs...@akamai.com> wrote: > > > On 9/26/19, 11:51 PM, "Martin Thomson" <m...@lowentropy.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, at 10:52, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > >> """The expectation is that TLSv1.2 will continue to be used for > > >> many years alongside TLSv1.3.""" > > > > So is your proposed change to only remove that sentence? > > > wonder if that change really amounts to a worthwhile thing. > > > I do. Or I wouldn't have written the email. Do you think that this > is a valuable statement? I think that it says that the IETF lacks > confidence in the suitability of TLS 1.3 as a replacement for TLS 1.2. > > It is a statement of real-world deployment. I am against removing it. > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
