On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:45:04AM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> 
> On 27/09/2019 04:50, Martin Thomson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, at 10:52, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> >>>> """The expectation is that TLSv1.2 will continue to be used
> >>>> for many years alongside TLSv1.3."""
> >> 
> >> So is your proposed change to only remove that sentence?
> > 
> > I just checked, and it seems like the only thing the document says
> > along these lines, so yeah.
> 
> Grand so. Like I said I don't think it's a biggie so I've
> commented out that sentence in the GH version. [1]
> 
>   [1]
> https://github.com/tlswg/oldversions-deprecate/blob/master/draft-ietf-tls-oldversions-deprecate.txt
> 
> BTW - for the chairs/AD - how are we doing on getting IETF LC under
> way? I realise the world won't end if this isn't super-fast but it's
> been 3 months since publication was requested which seems like a bit
> of a while.

I had a run of several substantial events in my personal life earlier
this year, that let the queue of documents in "publication requested"
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ad/benjamin.kaduk) build up for
2-3 months.  Catching up to that has been slower, but I'm working on it.

-Ben

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to