On Fri, Sep 27, 2019, at 10:52, Stephen Farrell wrote: > >> """The expectation is that TLSv1.2 will continue to be used for > >> many years alongside TLSv1.3.""" > > So is your proposed change to only remove that sentence?
I just checked, and it seems like the only thing the document says along these lines, so yeah. > Personally, I'm not that fussed. Including or omitting that > seems not a big deal to me. If the WG are however keen on > such a change that's fine too. OTOH, we've already done a > bunch of process-steps with this process-draft so I do > wonder if that change really amounts to a worthwhile thing. I do. Or I wouldn't have written the email. Do you think that this is a valuable statement? I think that it says that the IETF lacks confidence in the suitability of TLS 1.3 as a replacement for TLS 1.2. If you want a smaller change, s/many years/some time/ _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
