* Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> [18/11/2016 03:13:23] wrote: > At IETF 97, the chairs lead a discussion to resolve whether the WG should > rebrand TLS1.3 to something else. Slides can be found @ > https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-tls-rebranding-aka-pr612-01.pdf. > > The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to not > rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4. We need to confirm this decision on > the list so please let the list know your top choice between: > > - Leave it TLS 1.3
Please let's keep it to TLS 1.3 which we have been talking about for a couple of years now, no-one expects a protocol from this WG with a different name (of course I'd opt for SSLv5 just to mess with people). Aaron
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
