Thanks to all those that participated in the list discussion, it was a very popular topic. On the list and in the meeting, TLS 1.3 had more support than any other option so we believe there is rough consensus to leave the name of the protocol as TLS 1.3.
Thanks, J&S On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 10:15 PM, Mohan Sekar <mohan.se...@edgeverve.com> wrote: > +1 on Tony comment > > > > - Keep this version TLS 1.3 > > - For the next version of TLS, drop the 1.x and call it TLS 4 > > > > Mohan Sekar > > > > *From:* TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Tony Arcieri > *Sent:* Saturday, December 3, 2016 9:04 AM > *To:* Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> > *Cc:* <tls@ietf.org> <tls@ietf.org> > *Subject:* Re: [TLS] Confirming consensus: TLS1.3->TLS* > > > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 6:12 PM, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > The consensus in the room was to leave it as is, i.e., TLS1.3, and to not > rebrand it to TLS 2.0, TLS 2, or TLS 4. We need to confirm this decision > on the list so please let the list know your top choice between: > > - Leave it TLS 1.3 > - Rebrand TLS 2.0 > - Rebrand TLS 2 > - Rebrand TLS 4 > > by 2 December 2016. > > > > I guess we're at the deadline, but I have a compromise I think makes sense: > > > > - Keep this version TLS 1.3 > > - For the next version of TLS, drop the 1.x and call it TLS 4 > > > > -- > > Tony Arcieri > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
