On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 03:18:11 pm Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Bill Cox <waywardg...@google.com> wrote: > > I wish that were the plan (to upgrade QUIC crypto and eventually make that > > the new crypto platform). If I am not mistaken, QUICK crypto is going to > > be archived, TLS 1.3 will replace the crypto code, and QUIC will remain the > > transport layer. > > This is my understanding as well, based both onconversations with the QUIC > folks, and Adam and Jana's public presentations. A number of us (MT, I, > Jana, Ian, AGL, Christian) have already started some initial conversations > at how to do that.
I'm quite interested to hear what the plans are there. I'd appreciate it if, whenever there is a fleshed-out starting point, an outline could be posted to this list to keep us in the loop with what's going to be the initial design. Not necessarily for debate here, but just so we can have an idea of where things are going. > With that said, I don't think there's a plausible story in which QUIC becomes > the only > transport protocol in the world any time soon, so I don't think standalone > TLS 1.3 > is going away. Yes. Whatever the discussion for future work, TLS 1.3 is the current direction. One step at a time so we don't trip over our feet. ;) Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
