On Tuesday 12 January 2016 15:14:13 Dave Garrett wrote: > On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 03:03:42 pm Andrei Popov wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 02:39:15 pm Dave Garrett wrote: > > > I hope that Google's efforts to get QUIC as-is specced out go > > > quickly and smoothly, and that it can be used as a basis to > > > develop an official total TCP/TLS replacement.> > > If this were the path forward (and I doubt that it is), I would very > > much prefer Peter Gutman's evolutionary TLS 1.3. > I was just chatting a bit off-list, and apparently I wasn't aware of > QUIC's latest plans, so it's not as clear as I previously said. > Unfortunately, it seems that they have yet to actually write anything > down (a too frequent pattern with QUIC), so I can't really comment on > what I'd like to see happen in this realm anymore. > > In any case, ~whatever~ comes after TLS 1.3 will hopefully have some > major changes. I have no idea what that will be, but TLS 1.3 comes > first. That's a discussion for a future time.
I remember this one quote, not sure who is it attributed to, but it goes something like this: "I don't know what will replace Ethernet, but I'm sure it also will be called Ethernet" -- Regards, Hubert Kario Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
