On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 03:03:42 pm Andrei Popov wrote: > On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 02:39:15 pm Dave Garrett wrote: > > I hope that Google's efforts to get QUIC as-is specced out go quickly and > > smoothly, and that it can be used as a basis to develop an official total > > TCP/TLS replacement. > > If this were the path forward (and I doubt that it is), I would very much > prefer Peter Gutman's evolutionary TLS 1.3.
I was just chatting a bit off-list, and apparently I wasn't aware of QUIC's latest plans, so it's not as clear as I previously said. Unfortunately, it seems that they have yet to actually write anything down (a too frequent pattern with QUIC), so I can't really comment on what I'd like to see happen in this realm anymore. In any case, ~whatever~ comes after TLS 1.3 will hopefully have some major changes. I have no idea what that will be, but TLS 1.3 comes first. That's a discussion for a future time. Dave _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
