On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Brian Smith <br...@briansmith.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Eric Rescorla <e...@rtfm.com> wrote: > >> In addition, they are already part of TLS, so the question would be if we >> have >> consensus to remove them.... >> > > This thread is about the removal of DH_anon_*, not about raw public keys. > Yes, I'm aware of that. The point I was making was that presently we have: - Certificates - Raw keys - Anon This proposal is to remove Anon, thus making things strictly simpler, since Raw keys can replace Anon but not the other way around. One might imagine a proposal to remove Raw keys, but that's not the question here and even if that failed (as I expect it would) things will still be simpler if we remove Anon. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
