On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 01:20:37PM -0700, Brian Smith wrote:
> I think it is a good idea to remove DH_anon_* and similar ECDH_anon_*
> cipher suites.
> 
> This isn't an endorsement of the raw public key modes.

Sure, one can always use self-signed certs (at an even higher cost to do
anonymity).  If we're going to raise the cost of anonymity for the sake
of simplicity in TLS 1.3, do let's try to keep that cost from
escalating.  Raw public keys are not a large additional complexity cost.

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to