On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:40:28AM -0700, Martin Thomson wrote: > On 15 September 2015 at 18:00, Joseph Salowey <j...@salowey.net> wrote: > > remove anonymous DH > > +1 > > It's not like we're making the use case impossible, just that the > solution will look different.
And will be more costly. I'm neutral on this, as I don't think the extra cost will lead to, say, MTAs forgoing TLS for SMTP. Nico -- _______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
