On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andrei Popov <andrei.po...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> To clarify, the proposal includes removing ECDH_anon, right? > Yes. > If it does, I support it. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andrei > > > > *From:* TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Joseph Salowey > *Sent:* Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:01 PM > *To:* tls@ietf.org > *Subject:* [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH > > > > There has been some discussion to remove anonymous DH as described in > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg17481.html. I think > ekr's message sums up the pros and cons well. I don't think we have > consensus on this issue yet. Please respond on this message by Monday, > September 21, if you have an opinion. > > > > Thanks, > > > > J&S > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > TLS@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list TLS@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls