On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:35 AM, Andrei Popov <andrei.po...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> To clarify, the proposal includes removing ECDH_anon, right?
>

Yes.



> If it does, I support it.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> Andrei
>
>
>
> *From:* TLS [mailto:tls-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Joseph Salowey
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 15, 2015 6:01 PM
> *To:* tls@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [TLS] Call for consensus to remove anonymous DH
>
>
>
> There has been some discussion to remove anonymous DH as described in
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tls/current/msg17481.html.  I think
> ekr's message sums up the pros and cons well.  I don't think we have
> consensus on this issue yet.  Please respond on this message by Monday,
> September 21, if you have an opinion.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> J&S
>
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list
> TLS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls
>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list
TLS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls

Reply via email to