-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 01/07/2014 02:05 PM, Steve Langasek wrote: > Not even remotely! The result of rebooting to a different kernel > after hibernate is loss of application state and an unclean > filesystem. That needs much better than a big red 'reboot' flag, > which doesn't tell the user anything about hibernate being > dangerous.
It isn't worth throwing the baby out with the bath water to fix. Apparently it was never a big enough deal to fix properly, so it isn't a good reason to disable hibernate all together. > Right - as noted in my other mail, one of the failure scenarios > here is that the user hibernates, closes up the laptop and stows it > in the bag, not realizing it's failed to hibernate. Like I said there, I can see disabling it for lid switch if it can't be fixed to fall back to standby properly, but that doesn't mean that manual hibernate should be disabled. > I don't think there's any evidence of this being true. I think > there's a very small percentage of Ubuntu power users who > understand the difference between suspend and hibernate - using > those names - well enough to take advantage of that difference; and > then there's the much larger number of ordinary users, who should > be protected from the bugs. Everyone I know who is moderately computer literate and used windows 95, 2000 or xp on a laptop was quite aware of the difference. As I said when I started this thread, the popularity of the question on how to fix this on askubuntu and the number of comments in the bug report shows that the number of people who want it is *not* small. > There are ways that educated users can re-enable hibernate support > today (Marc alluded to one of them in this thread). I don't think > we should expose hibernate more broadly than it already is without > corresponding effort to improve the reliability of the option. Having to google for tips on editing an xml file that is replaced on upgrade is not acceptable. Users looking for this feature must be able to find it relatively easily, like with a check box added to the gnome power settings. And before you say patches are welcome, this burden really should have been on those wanting to disable it in the first place, but if that is what it takes to get it turned back on, I'll try to put some time into it. Part of the reason I brought this up to the technical board is because I don't want to waste my time if it won't be accepted. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJSzI2dAAoJEI5FoCIzSKrwDioH/i6GTn37qR0qcAVGRP5ynTFk rhjosWW/AQfwfcwc0MdO6aID7K2++Pj+hIMOZmBZ8gZmlY3DD7PZ/vy3KOPXwiLz Qk4kYHw6m6FVr24RYR9Z5e9fJDJpP/+4QUImsbOB+MVWQTO/WXbwHRNx5YUZAUPS Ksg8zTncWK+cPEe+Tcrr6zasWdDnDx7bAcNMezN8EiWEbp+FlcPJyCAxE0OC1/q1 2iJRmP/AX1b5N/t3aWSjhF39k5th4wTemTLttnuYfQeEQmsxjIQw3Ey96w6zMLg1 fSyOc3Z5N0BW1LzgCI58CSHDaaocx+b0/Nj8UQq6oSPGCbbSC6lPnvEG8v6Qi38= =VgK3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- technical-board mailing list technical-board@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/technical-board
