--- Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 
> On Dec 12, 2005, at 2:35 PM, Konstantin Ignatyev
> wrote:
> > Clarification: al I am saying does not mean that
> we do
> > not need test. It means that tests are useful but
> not
> > the reason for throwing away safety net of static
> type
> > checks.
> 
> And my point is, and has been that static type
> checks are a false  
> illusion of "safety".

I think you mistakenly assume that I argue that static
checking is THE safety net. Please reread the thread
again - nowhere I said nor implied that. I am saying
that static type checking is a useful safety net among
others, including tests.
I see no reasons to throw this safety net away and
have one less correctness check than it is
theoretically possible.



> 
> Look at all the reflective magic that occurs under
> the covers of  
> Tapestry.  Without tests, it would be a huge house
> of cards.  Howard  
> is a diligent tester *because* he realizes the value
> in them.  Had he  
> only relied on the compiler, we'd all be building
> with servlets where  
> you get that security blanket of static type
> checking.  Don't even  
> use JSP's - unless you compile them during your
> build process (but  
> who does?).
> 
>       Erik

Well, I do compile them at one of the steps in the
main build process, not in my routine development
build task.
It has proven to be very useful for catching many
stupid mistakes.

I wish I could do that for Tapestry pages.

Konstantin Ignatyev




PS: If this is a typical day on planet earth, humans will add fifteen million 
tons of carbon to the atmosphere, destroy 115 square miles of tropical 
rainforest, create seventy-two miles of desert, eliminate between forty to one 
hundred species, erode seventy-one million tons of topsoil, add 2,700 tons of 
CFCs to the stratosphere, and increase their population by 263,000

Bowers, C.A.  The Culture of Denial:  Why the Environmental Movement Needs a 
Strategy for Reforming Universities and Public Schools.  New York:  State 
University of New York Press, 1997: (4) (5) (p.206)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to