sent from a phone > On 10 Nov 2022, at 21:21, Sven Geggus <li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de> wrote: > All the sites in the above changeset would need one or more additional > redundant tags like restaurant=yes on the main node or way if a site > relation is no longer an option. so a restaurant is part of the camp site, but is not on the site but somewhere near, right? Or maybe you can give an example so we can better understand the problem? _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=sit... Sven Geggus
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type... Martin Koppenhoefer
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type... Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of ... Sven Geggus
- Re: [Tagging] Relation... Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=site + ... Sven Geggus
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=sit... Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type... Casper Kersten
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=sit... Marc_marc
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=site + touri... Sven Geggus
- Re: [Tagging] Relations of type=site + ... Martin Koppenhoefer