Nov 10, 2022, 21:21 by li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de: > Marc_marc <marc_m...@mailo.com> wrote: > >> taking one random exemple : >> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13012999#map=19/49.12702/10.86422 >> according to the parking name=*, the parking may be include in the >> tourism=site_camp >> > > Yes but this is simply not as it is on the ground. The parking is not _part_ > of the camp-site but for visitors as well as the restaurant and shop. They > are not stritly cusomers only like the enclosed area. > >> if someone think that the restaurant and the shop are also part of the >> camp site, then it's easy to extend the area to include those. >> > > Which is just plain wrong as they are not _only_. > So https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/13012999#map=19/49.12702/10.86422 site relation is including nearby restaurant and shop? That are not actually part of camp site? And just included there to manually do processing part of finding nearby shops/restaurants? In which way this shop/restaurant is part of being camp site except of being nearby?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
