Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > Yes, using site relation in addition to actual object breaks this rule > and it is undesirable (and site relations in general are problematic).
Why do you think that "site relations in general are problematic"? > Is there some reason why this camp sites cannot be mapped as areas > if someone is doing such detailed mapping? Of course there are. The thing is that objects outside (usually ways and nodes) might be part of a particular camp_site. E.g. when a sport-center and a camp_site are sharing there sanitary buildings. I did not implement the support for this in OpenCampingMap just for fun. I really do think that there is a need for this. All the sites in the above changeset would need one or more additional redundant tags like restaurant=yes on the main node or way if a site relation is no longer an option. Regards Sven -- Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety (Benjamin Franklin) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
