Anders, I didn't see this until after I sent my reply. I believe this list here is interested in what you call "missing features," as a list. I look at them as challenges of ours or frustrations of yours which can either be explained or solved. You might not like the explanations.
For example, if you were to expound upon differences between "mountain" (as Anders, or Sweden understands it) and natural=peak (as OSM understands it), we're listening. You might be prompted to "make a proposal for mountain" or "write a wiki for how your first mountain=whatever or whatever=mountain tag you recently started to enter (because it is well thought-out, defined, follows sensible rules about 'what it is' and 'how it is tagged'...)" is now extant, and so on. To solve such frustrations doesn't necessarily include this or that about mountaineering. This is called reducing the map consumer's perspective, as you simply "tag well and accurately using a syntax expressing what you mean." If there is no such tagging, we might support it (as new tagging and/or a new proposal) and maybe someday it will be rendered. This is (partly) how our map data have grown, it is how our map data continue to grow. SteveA _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
