Does each bog & marsh have it's own name, or are just different surfaces inside one big named wetland?
Thanks Graeme PS & please don't get frustrated & give up on trying to make progress! On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 02:11, Anders Torger <and...@torger.se> wrote: > Hello, > > I was on this list a while back expressing some frustration over > limitations when tagging nature and thought about getting involved in a > process for change, but I came to realize that it's not feasible for me > in my current life situation, so I've decided to continue be a normal > mapper as before, doing what I can do with features that exist today. > > Anyway, if to be a mapper at all, I still like to solve some of my > naming issues in the best/least bad ways possible today. I'm currently > mapping a national park in Sweden, Muddus. It's in Laponia and consists > of mighty wetlands and old forest. These wetlands are named, like is > common in Sweden and Sami lands. For us navigating in wildlife, names in > nature are important. > > A wetland polygon can be named in OSM, so the situation is better than > for example for named slopes (also common). However, a wetland here can > consist of both bog and marsh (and it's important to make the > difference, since one is easy to walk on, the other not so much). That's > two different natural types and thus can't be in the same multipolygon > (as outers). > > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
