Sorry, ignore me as it looks like the question had already been answered. When I opened the message, your original question was the only thing there, but when I answered, all the other earlier replies appeared?
No idea what's going on there? Guess gmail must be having a bad morning! Thanks Graeme On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 08:44, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does each bog & marsh have it's own name, or are just different surfaces > inside one big named wetland? > > Thanks > > Graeme > > PS & please don't get frustrated & give up on trying to make progress! > > > On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 02:11, Anders Torger <and...@torger.se> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I was on this list a while back expressing some frustration over >> limitations when tagging nature and thought about getting involved in a >> process for change, but I came to realize that it's not feasible for me >> in my current life situation, so I've decided to continue be a normal >> mapper as before, doing what I can do with features that exist today. >> >> Anyway, if to be a mapper at all, I still like to solve some of my >> naming issues in the best/least bad ways possible today. I'm currently >> mapping a national park in Sweden, Muddus. It's in Laponia and consists >> of mighty wetlands and old forest. These wetlands are named, like is >> common in Sweden and Sami lands. For us navigating in wildlife, names in >> nature are important. >> >> A wetland polygon can be named in OSM, so the situation is better than >> for example for named slopes (also common). However, a wetland here can >> consist of both bog and marsh (and it's important to make the >> difference, since one is easy to walk on, the other not so much). That's >> two different natural types and thus can't be in the same multipolygon >> (as outers). >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
