service=parking_access also sounds most clear to me. On the other hand, service=parking is already used almost 2000 times so documenting that as "main access road in a parking" would just be documenting the status quo, no proposal necessary, which is certainly easier.
IF after research one can actually conclude that service=parking is really used for that purpose and not for all kinds of roads in parking that should actually be parking_aisles. So before reaching a conclusion, I'd strongly suggest to first analyse a bit what really is the status quo with service=parking. Cheers Tobias On 03/08/2020 11:25, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > Am Mo., 3. Aug. 2020 um 11:06 Uhr schrieb Tom Pfeifer > <t.pfei...@computer.org <mailto:t.pfei...@computer.org>>: > > Possibilities discussed were: > > service=parking_access > service=main > service=access > service=major > > > > apart "access", all of these seem better than "parking". My preference > would go to the more neutral "main" or "major" > > Cheers > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
