I agree that it would be helpful to distinguish more subtypes of
highway=service.
However I find the proposed 'service=parking' misleading, as it suggests the
way itself is
used for parking, not that it provides access to such facility.
I started a similar discussion four years ago, here is the thread start:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2016-March/028982.html
Possibilities discussed were:
service=parking_access
service=main
service=access
service=major
tom
On 03.08.2020 10:39, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 3. Aug 2020, at 06:09, David Dean <dd...@ieee.org> wrote:
On the main parking road, I think we are largely in agreement that
service=parking would be a good addition to OSM documentation (and is already
in use throughout the world, as such).
if we need a specific service subtag for the access to parkings (which is
already implicit through the fact that the road leads to a parking, and which
leads to uncertainty which tag to choose if the road leads to parking and
another use, like delivery for supermarkets), I would prefer are more verbose
tag, as it is foreseeable that “parking“ will be confused with “parking_aisle”.
Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
