But also consider that it wouldn't make sense to tag a motorway as foot=no + bicycle=dismount (+ moped=dismount + mofa=dismount + auto_rickshaw=no + agricultural=no), because the combination of tags would create a completely new meaning, and that is not a preferred tagging practice in OSM.
I.e., bicycle=dismount means that you can proceed after you dismount, however if a certain combination of other tags are also present (foot=no), a data user would need to ignore this, making this more confusing than necessary (bicycle=no). By the way, shouldn't simply adding motor_vehicle=only be sufficient? That mostly covers the legal definition around here. On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:26 PM Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > On 22. Jul 2020, at 22:51, bkil <bkil.hu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > bicycle=no is usually used on busy motorways where dismounting isn't > feasible: > https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nederlands_verkeersbord_C14.svg > > On such a road, a bicycle router should only offer to dismount if the road > has sidewalk=!none. > > > > on motorways there is also foot=no, this is why dismounting isn’t an > option there. Generally we assume that dismounting makes the cyclist a > pedestrian (vast majority of bicycle=no are just the same as dismount), and > the rest is a different kind of question (what kind of objects are you not > allowed to bring, including bicycles, firearms, alcohol, religious symbols, > political symbols, animals, sneakers, scissors, face masks, fireworks, etc. > etc.) > > > Cheers Martin > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
