Normal OSM access is assumed to be access=yes, where some access is restricted then in OSM it should be marked *=no.

So where a train forbids bicycle transport then bicycle=no should be applied or some local default of bicycle=no on trains be documented.

Locally to me some trains require the bicycle to be boxed, but not all trains require this. None of this to my knowledge is OSM tagged here, many train routes have not been mapped in OSM so this detail is of a much lower priority.

On 19/6/20 10:33 pm, Peter Elderson wrote:
I think a bicycle route can not declare a rail route to be bicycle=yes. I think you should verify that the train is bicycle=yes before you call it a transfer. If it isn't, you can't declare it to be a part of your waymarked bicycle route, can you?

Apart from that, if a router uses the bicycle route relation, it should alway check the ways themselves for access, no matter what the route relation says.

Fr gr Peter Elderson


Op vr 19 jun. 2020 om 14:02 schreef Francesco Ansanelli <franci...@gmail.com <mailto:franci...@gmail.com>>:

    Dear Volker and Peter,

    I agree with you both...
    The question was born for a bike+train (funicular actually), but
    it can be implemented in a generic way to fix similar cases.
    Insead of interrupting the relation on the railway, we can put
    the other public transport one as a member with a "transfer" role.
    Of course, I assume the transfer relation will have 1 or 2 common
    points with our trip (stops):
    let's say a train starts from station A, but we take it at station
    B with our bike, we get off at station C, but the last station
    will be Z.
    I don't think this could be an issue, but should be considered for
    any future implementation.
    Transfer relations should also consider the parent's relation type
    (ex. route=bicycle, implies bicycle=yes on the train route).
    What do you think?

    Francesco

    _______________________________________________
    Tagging mailing list
    Tagging@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Tagging@openstreetmap.org>
    https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging


_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to