Dear Volker and Peter, I agree with you both... The question was born for a bike+train (funicular actually), but it can be implemented in a generic way to fix similar cases. Insead of interrupting the relation on the railway, we can put the other public transport one as a member with a "transfer" role. Of course, I assume the transfer relation will have 1 or 2 common points with our trip (stops): let's say a train starts from station A, but we take it at station B with our bike, we get off at station C, but the last station will be Z. I don't think this could be an issue, but should be considered for any future implementation. Transfer relations should also consider the parent's relation type (ex. route=bicycle, implies bicycle=yes on the train route). What do you think?
Francesco
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
