> 27 maj 2020 kl. 12:42 skrev Volker Schmidt <vosc...@gmail.com>: > > > > […]how to indicate that a path is a hiking trail. It has been proposed to > introduce a new value path=trail or path=hiking for that purpose. > As we do already have the sac_scale tagging for level of difficulty of hiking > paths and the lowest level of that is sac_scale=hiking. This would correspond > exactly, in my view, to the new proposed tag value(s) without introducing a > new tagging. > sac_scale=hiking is used 319 785 times - so I do not see a need to create a > new tagging meaning exactly the same thing. >
Would it be wrong to set sac_scale=hiking on an urban footway? I’m worried that we’ll get highway=path, foot=designated, cycle=designated, surface=paved, width=2.5, lit=yes, rubbish_bins_every=100m, sac_scale=hiking. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
