May 21, 2020, 23:15 by miketh...@gmail.com:

>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 1:35 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> 
> tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > May 21, 2020, 19:20 by > miketh...@gmail.com> :
> >
> > So are we saying highway=path/cycleway/footway implies width<3 (or some 
> > similar value)?
> >
> > Yes, but it may be larger. Especially busy cycleway, or cycleway on curve, 
> > or cycleway
> > on a slope may be noticeably larger.
> >
> > There is also an old problem how large footway should be to qualify as a 
> > pedestrian road,
> > with varied opinions.
> Would you also say then that a way tagged as highway=path/footway/cycleway, 
> width=4 would be an error?
>
It is not an automatic error.

Cycleway bridge 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=50.03088&mlon=19.81907#map=19/50.03088/19.81907
is quite wide, still it is clearly a cycleway.

Some areas with heavy tourism and slowly recovering nature may have extremely 
wide paths,
Czerwone Wierchy in Tatra Mountains are one of sad cases.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Czerwone_Wierchy_widok_w_stron%C4%99_Tatr_Wysokich.jpg
It is certainly path (tagged as highway=path or highway=footway)

> General comment: I am happy to map/tag in any internally consistent way 
> according to community consensus.  However, when it comes to the highway=* 
> tag, it seems that we have a mix of functional classification and physical 
> classification, which is confusing. 
>
It is functional classification, except highway=motorway.

For simplicity and to avoid discussions people try to assign them some 
administrative
matches (maybe it works in UK as OSM copied UK administrative classification),
people try to assign physical classification.

There are unpaved highway=trunk, there are paved highway=track and so on.

> A way that is used to access a private residence from a public road is 
> highway=service, service=driveway (functional classification), unless it is 
> too long (exact distance not specified), or too rough (physical 
> classification).
>
Way used solely to access a private residence is always highway=service, 
service=driveway no matter
whatever it is short, long, paved, unpaved, lit, unlit, ugly or 22 lanes wide.

Why you think that "too rough" driveway is no longer highway=service, 
service=driveway?
(if based on poor wiki docs then I would be happy to fix, if it is based on iD 
presets then
I would not recommend using iD presets to learn how OSM tagging works - there 
are
some problematic cases like peculiar description of highway=track that are 
deliberately 
unfixed)


> If this is confusing for an experienced mapper and geodata geek, how are data 
> users/consumers supposed to figure this out?
>
Use OSM Wiki, use taginfo, look at data - if confused ask on mailing list (or 
elsewhere).
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to