On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 9:24 AM brad <bradha...@fastmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't agree with calling a 2 track/road a path and I don't think that
common usage, or the wiki says this either.
It is not really "2 track" as its surface is uniformly graded and covered
with gravel from side to side (there are not separate ruts for the wheels
on each side of a four-wheeled vehicle).  Keep in mind that the imagery
currently available to OSM is all outdated in regards to this feature as it
was just constructed over the last couple of months.  I only know its
physical characteristics because I biked and ran it soon after it was open
to the public.

>
> "This tag represents roads for mostly agricultural use, forest tracks
etc.; often unpaved (unsealed) but may apply to paved tracks as well, that
are suitable for two-track vehicles, such as tractors or jeeps. "
>
> I think the "etc" could mean a lot of things, such as mining roads, fire
roads, emergency access roads, etc
Well, it is not for any of these purposes, it is solely for recreational
use. We have a lot of paths, footways, and cycleways around here, paved and
unpaved, which are about the same width (~2.5m), e.g. [0]

>
> "If the way is not wide enough for a two-track vehicle, it should be
tagged as highway=path."
That does not necessarily imply that "if the way is wide enough for a
two-track vehicle, it should be tagged as highway=track." The quote only
talks about changing tracks to paths, not paths to tracks.


> "highway=track - for roads for agricultural use, gravel roads in the
forest etc."
Again, it is not for agricultural use, and it is not in the forest, it is
in a city owned "natural area" (which isn't forested).

So are we saying highway=path/cycleway/footway implies width<3 (or some
similar value)?

Mike

[0] https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/48573535 - width is not tagged, but
first hand observation and available imagery shows this "cycleway" is about
3 meters wide.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to