I prefer a single member route relation than a way with type=route, route=whatever. The later lead to much more uncertainty in the tags meaning. Yves
Le 13 mai 2020 18:17:37 GMT+02:00, brad <bradha...@fastmail.com> a écrit : >It isn't a route, except in OSM, it's just a trail. > >On 5/13/20 9:09 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 9:23 AM brad <bradha...@fastmail.com >> <mailto:bradha...@fastmail.com>> wrote: >> >> It isn't part of a route, it's the whole route. >> >> >> I think that's a difference without a distinction in this case. >Data >> consumers still need to know the route is there. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
