Le 12 mai 2020 19:02:24 GMT+02:00, Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> a écrit 
:
>My view is that a route should have an indication on the ground. A
>sign, a
>trailhead, something. No verifiable indication whatsoever, then it's
>not a
>route.
>
>The length or the number of ways in the route does not make a
>difference to
>me.
>
I'll also include 'well known' or 'commonly used' in your definition.
Yves 

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to