On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:26 PM Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:36 AM Florimond Berthoux > <florimond.berth...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Le lun. 10 févr. 2020 à 09:49, AndreasTUHU <poggy...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>> I agree that 'surface' tag should be mandatory but in Hungary 54 percent of >>> the mixed foot-cycle-ways misses this tag. >>> Additionally, the 20 percent of foot-cycle-ways has no 'segregated' tag. >>> Not ideal conditions for converting mixed cycleways to path :) >> >> >> I don’t understand, for me a mixed cycleway has no sense, if it’s mixed well >> it is a path segregated or not. > > > It's common in North America. Sometimes it even switches between a path and > a cycleway. Galloping Goose Cycleway and Trail in Canada's a fantastic > example of both. > > 1. Cycleway that allows pedestrians: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galloping_Goose_Regional_Trail#/media/File:Galloping_Goose_Regional_Trail,_Saanich,_British_Columbia,_Canada_17.jpg
Curious to understand why this is a cycleway and not an asphalted path. regards m _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
