On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 3:36 AM Florimond Berthoux < florimond.berth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Le lun. 10 févr. 2020 à 09:49, AndreasTUHU <poggy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> I agree that 'surface' tag should be mandatory but in Hungary 54 percent >> of the mixed foot-cycle-ways misses this tag. >> Additionally, the 20 percent of foot-cycle-ways has no 'segregated' tag. >> Not ideal conditions for converting mixed cycleways to path :) >> > > I don’t understand, for me a mixed cycleway has no sense, if it’s mixed > well it is a path segregated or not. > It's common in North America. Sometimes it even switches between a path and a cycleway. Galloping Goose Cycleway and Trail in Canada's a fantastic example of both. 1. Cycleway that allows pedestrians: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galloping_Goose_Regional_Trail#/media/File:Galloping_Goose_Regional_Trail,_Saanich,_British_Columbia,_Canada_17.jpg 2. A path segment of the same in a more rural area: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galloping_Goose_Regional_Trail#/media/File:Galloping_Goose_Trail._INFO_IN_PANORAMIO_DESCRIPTION_-_panoramio.jpg 3. Keep going further out and it becomes a track (with obvious evidence doubletracked vehicles, like maintenance trucks, do use it, but probably not open to most motor vehicles): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galloping_Goose_Regional_Trail#/media/File:Galloping_Goose_Trail_-_a_restored_train_station_near_the_Sooke_Potholes.jpg
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
