Feb 7, 2020, 17:08 by pla16...@gmail.com: > On Fri, 7 Feb 2020 at 15:25, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging <> > tagging@openstreetmap.org> > wrote: > >> Feb 7, 2020, 15:53 by >> pla16...@gmail.com>> : >> >>> Then we give up on entirely sensible ideas because Carto insists on a "no >>> synonyms" rule. Which leads me to say, frequently, that OSM >>> doesn't do joined-up thinking. >>> >> landcover is disliked by big part of this mailing list and iD devs and JOSM >> devs. >> > > Landcover=* has 153,499 uses. Or did you mean landcover=grass specifically? > That's the second-most popular, with 19,755 uses despite not being rendered. > For a tag that's not supported by editors or rendered, that's significant use. > landuse=grass alone has 3.5 million of uses > If landcover were approved, iD and JOSM might decide to support it. But > probably not, because it doesn't render, and they wouldn't want to deal with > people raising issues about iD suggesting tags that don't render. > iD and JOSM and Vespucci support many many many tags that are not rendered lack of rendering is not the blocker > Editors won't support it because it doesn't render. Around > and around we go. > lack of rendering in OSM Carto is not the blocker for adding presets. JOSM, iD, Vespucci have many things in presets that are not rendered in OSM Carto. Note: please do not report new issues if there is already existing issue for such request
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
