Hi, I think it's not exactly the same feature, one thing interesting in the bicycle_parking for cyclist it to know if you can secure your bike. With floor value I know there is nothing to lock my bike with. Whereas surface value for parking tag just say that is a parking facility on the ground (not underground or in a multi-storey).
For instance you can have a bicycle_parking=floor in a parking facility parking=multi-storey. Though I don't know the best english word for this feature, as long as it's documented it's fine for me. Le ven. 31 janv. 2020 à 07:46, John Willis via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> a écrit : > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bicycle_parking > > It lists “floor” as the value for a wide open outdoor space with no stands > or other affordances designated for parking bicycles. > > this seems weird to me. the ground / asphalt area next to a supermarket is > not a “floor”. > > we use “surface” in car parking lots, and there are many of other types of > indoor tags for tagging when a bike is in a building or shed (similar to > parking=multilevel). > > I think that the values be standardized and the wiki changed. > > there is 60 uses of (undocumented) =surface and ~260 uses of (documented) > =floor. > > we should standardize how we tag parking lots for any vehicle if it is > just a flat outdoor surface. > > Javbw > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Florimond Berthoux
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
