Hi Paul, Thank you for your suggestion.
I have added links in a separate section and made the criteria in the proposal section stand out more clearly. best regards, Stuart On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 16:34, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 15:27, European Water Project < > europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Andy suggests : >> >> "drinking_water:refill=yes" and >> "drinking_water:refill_scheme=[scheme-name]" >> >> As long as two of the options for "scheme-name" can be "multiple" or >> "yes", this alternative two tagging method seems more KISS than the one >> being currently voted on- >> > > It's better because it allows mapping places offering free refills that > aren't part of > a scheme (as long as the place has a sign stating it offers free refills). > > If you're rejigging the proposal anyway, how about providing links to the > schemes > you mention and also criteria for mapping (the main one being that there > is a sign)? > > -- > Paul > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
