Hello, As per yesterday's note, I would like to make the following tweek to the tag pair as per the suggestion from Kovposch for the final write-up.
drinking_water:refill=yes/drinking_water:refill=no drinking_water:refill:network=network-name1;network-name2;network-name3; instead of : drinking_water:refill=yes/drinking_water:refill=no drinking_water:refill_scheme=scheme-name1;scheme-name2;scheme-name3; Does anyone believe another round of voting is necessary for this small change ? I don't mind. Best regards, Stuart On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 09:33, European Water Project < europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Again, > > In addition to the previous email regarding voting outcome, I think it is > worth discussing the suggestion of Kovposch to make refill a namespace and > use the word network. > > This would change the second tag of the tag pair to > drinking_water:refill:network=network-name1;network-name2;network-name3; > > > Does anyone have an opinion on this? I personally prefer this namespace > convention because of I find it more generic and I find the word "network" > clearer than "scheme". > > Best regards, > > Stuart > > On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 09:27, European Water Project < > europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear All, >> >> The proposal for tagging bars, restaurants, cafés, kiosks, which refill >> water bottles for free as part of a refill scheme or as an independent >> passes with 13 positive votes and three abstentions. Please note, that to >> be tagged drinking_water:refill = yes, it is imperative that a sign is >> evident so that the tag is verifiable. >> >> The tag that has been voted positively takes into account the clear >> preference for delimiting individual scheme names with semicolons - which >> is common with other tags. >> >> >> - drinking_water:refill >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:drinking_water:refill&action=edit&redlink=1> >> =yes >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:drinking_water:refill%3Dyes&action=edit&redlink=1> >> /drinking_water:refill >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:drinking_water:refill&action=edit&redlink=1> >> =no >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:drinking_water:refill%3Dno&action=edit&redlink=1> >> - drinking_water:refill_scheme >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:drinking_water:refill_scheme&action=edit&redlink=1> >> =scheme-name >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:drinking_water:refill_scheme%3Dscheme-name&action=edit&redlink=1> >> 1; scheme-name >> >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Tag:drinking_water:refill_scheme%3Dscheme-name&action=edit&redlink=1> >> 2;scheme-name3; >> >> >> Can someone please guide me on next steps ? >> >> >> - Create the permanent feature description page: >> >> >> - A new page for the feature should be created and the relevant map >> features >> template >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Features_template> >> (depending >> on whether it is a key, a value, or a relation) should be applied. Follow >> the standard set by the Key:highway >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:highway> key and its values. >> - Add a link back to the proposal by using the *statuslink* parameter >> of the feature template. >> - Add a link to the permanent feature page in the proposal page using >> Template:Approved >> feature link >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Approved_feature_link>. >> - Archive the proposal using Template:Archived proposal >> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Archived_proposal>. >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Stuart >> >> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 14:43, European Water Project < >> europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi Joseph, >>> >>> Understood. >>> >>> I will start a discussion on the proposal amendment/tweek after the vote >>> finishes tomorrow. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> Stuart >>> >>> On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 at 13:23, Joseph Eisenberg < >>> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> > For 2) What is the best way to proceed? >>>> >>>> Make another proposal to discuss that particular tag. >>>> >>>> - Joseph Eisenberg >>>> >>>> On 2/17/20, European Water Project <europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> > Tomorrow is the last day of voting. The proposal has positive >>>> support .. >>>> > 10 + and 2 Abs >>>> > >>>> > There are two comments which are worth noting : >>>> > >>>> > 1 . It seems there is a strong preference for semicolon delimited >>>> scheme >>>> > names as a preferred alternative to refill_scheme = multiple. Untess >>>> there >>>> > are voiced objections, I will amend the proposal after the final vote >>>> to >>>> > take this into consideration. >>>> > >>>> > 2. Kovposch >>>> > < >>>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=User:Kovposch&action=edit&redlink=1 >>>> > >>>> > suggested >>>> > making refill a namespace and changing refill_scheme to >>>> refill:network. >>>> > Intutitvely, this suggestion seems to be a good one, because of its >>>> more >>>> > generic nature. I also prefer the word "network" to "scheme" ... >>>> > >>>> > For 2) What is the best way to proceed ? It wouldn't be right to just >>>> > change the tag to something people haven't actually voted on. >>>> > >>>> > Best regards, >>>> > >>>> > Stuart >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 18:47, European Water Project < >>>> > europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Hi Martin, >>>> >> >>>> >> If it is clear that there is drinking water available for refill for >>>> >> everyone there is no need to be part of a scheme. >>>> >> >>>> >> Best regards, >>>> >> >>>> >> Stuart >>>> >> >>>> >> On Mon, 27 Jan 2020 at 18:40, Martin Koppenhoefer >>>> >> <dieterdre...@gmail.com> >>>> >> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Am Mo., 27. Jan. 2020 um 16:58 Uhr schrieb European Water Project < >>>> >>> europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> I think they do need a sign or it is impossible to objectively map >>>> >>>> whether a bar will refill a bottle of water for free for anyone (ie >>>> >>>> paying >>>> >>>> or non-paying customer). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I think if they provide a water tap in the customer area with a >>>> >>> "drinking >>>> >>> water" sign, it is perfectly ok and does not need more explanation. >>>> >>> Like in the linked photo above: >>>> >>> >>>> https://www.tripadvisor.com/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g187791-d1023845-i49797540-Palazzo_del_Freddo_Giovanni_Fassi-Rome_Lazio.html >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Cheers >>>> >>> Martin >>>> >>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>>> >>> Tagging mailing list >>>> >>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> Tagging@openstreetmap.org >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>>
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
