The minimum time for comments is 2 weeks that is 14 days, not the 10
given so far. Suggest you wait a little longer.
The minimum time for voting is 2 weeks that is 14 days,you may run
voting longer than that if you desire.
The link is wrong.
Most use
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Free_Water
so they can read the present proposal. then they go to ?? There is no
voting section presently ...
You need to do a tidy up?
On 27/1/20 6:48 pm, European Water Project wrote:
Dear All,
We have actively debated over the past 11 days the best manner to tag
an establishment which offers free water bottle refills as part of an
established scheme.
Thank you all for your comments and input during this tumultuous process.
After much deliberation, the latest proposal
"drinking_water:refill_scheme = <yes/no>" seems to have enough support
to merit being put to a vote.
Please find below the proposal for drinking_water:refill_scheme being
which is being put to vote.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features/Free_Water&action=edit
Best regards,
Stuart
On Thu, 23 Jan 2020 at 15:29, Markus Peloso <mar....@outlook.com
<mailto:mar....@outlook.com>> wrote:
Thanks for that. Now it's clear for me.
+1 from me for drinking_water:refill_scheme
I found three national programs (with maps) that I think are
related to this tag.
- https://refill.org.uk/refill-schemes/
- https://refill-deutschland.de/
- http://www.fillitup.ch/karte.html
*Von: *European Water Project <mailto:europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com>
*Gesendet: *Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2020 08:02
*An: *Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
<mailto:tagging@openstreetmap.org>
*Betreff: *Re: [Tagging] RFC free_water
Dear All,
I have amended the proposal with the tag and a simplified example.
The proposal is definitely more KISS.
drinking_water:refill_scheme = <yes/no>
Best regards,
Stuart
On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 14:21, Philip Barnes <p...@trigpoint.me.uk
<mailto:p...@trigpoint.me.uk>> wrote:
On Wednesday, 22 January 2020, European Water Project wrote:
> Hi Paul et. al,
>
> I would also be very supportive of this straightforward approach
which
> would address many of the concerns regarding an over complicated
tagging
> scheme covering cases that are often mandated by local legislation.
>
> One clean solution could be the following or something similar.
>
> drinking_water:refill_scheme=<yes/no>
>
Thank you.
Paul's response did clear up my reservations on the idea.
The webpage makes it clear there is a sticker that is verifiable
without going in a asking. Not sure if that was mentioned before
or if I had simply missed it.
This meets the gold osm standard of Verifable.
Now I know there is something to look out for I can start looking
when I'm out.
Its a shame the website doesn't have location, I do not use Google
play, but I guess thats why you want to put them into OSM.
As its a UK scheme, discussion on the talk-gb list would be more
focussed and you will reach more mappers who are able to survey
and contribute.
Cheers
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Sailfish device
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
