sent from a phone
> On 22. May 2019, at 21:16, Nick Bolten <nbol...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ah, I see. Would you envision the only value for crossing:markings be "no",
> or would it potentially have yes/no/{type}, where mappers use it at their
> discretion - such as in this example?
yes/no/type
preferably no/{type}
Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
