---------- Původní e-mail ---------- Od: Mateusz Konieczny <matkoni...@tutanota.com> Komu: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools <tagging@openstreetmap.org> Datum: 5. 3. 2019 12:35:28 Předmět: Re: [Tagging] leisure=common replacement for public areas with some trees "
Mar 5, 2019, 11:48 AM by s...@smz.it: " Hi! On 2019-03-05 11:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: " Mar 5, 2019, 9:00 AM by mky...@email.cz(mailto:mky...@email.cz): " Typically a small areas in the city between apartment buildings. These areas are not official parks, gardens or grass. It is just a green accessible for everoyne. So we can say it is a *public* or *common* green. " So far I usually tagged such places as follows: Made sure that it is within landuse=residential (as it is a residential area) Mapped physical features (leisure=playground, natural=tree, landuse=grass, highway=footway etc) " Is it landuse=grass or landcover=grass? I tend to agree with Alessandro Sarretta who uses landcover... " landcover=grass also would be fine in this case, but meaning of this tags is the same and landuse=grass is more popular " landcover=grass - still not rendered: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/ 402959582 landuse=grass - means that there will be landuse (grass) on landuse (residental). Is this OK? I'm not sure If I want to create a lots of multipolygons because of this. Marián
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
