Landcover now has about 170 000 usage count. Still growing rapidly despite not yet being rendered on OSM Carto.
I would say that is enough reason to start renderin landcover on OSM Carto and other renderings. Once it renders, usage of landcover=[trees|grass|scrub] will grow even faster. Other values are mentioned less often, these three would do nicely for now. Many small areas of grass, trees and scrub within residential areas can be tagged as landcover patches, without breaking up the landuse or tagging landuse over landuse. Fr gr Peter Elderson Op di 5 mrt. 2019 om 13:08 schreef Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com>: > > On 05/03/2019 11:48, Marián Kyral wrote: > > landuse=grass - means that there will be landuse (grass) on landuse > > (residental). Is this OK? I'm not sure If I want to create a lots of > > multipolygons because of this. > > > > > Yes, renderers normally do sane things in cases such as this. In any > case the actual OSM tag is irrelevant by the time it gets to the > renderer, so landuse vs landcover makes no difference if the renderer > handles both. > > What would be a problem would be if anyone were to assume that "every > place is part of one and only one landuse polygon" but that isn't the > case for OSM now anyway. > > Best Regards, > > Andy > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
