Hi, recently was dropped [1] the leisure=common rendering from openstreetmap- carto as it is "misused" by mappers. A suggested replacements are: *leisure= park, landuse=grass and/or landuse=farmland*. But there are many places around, that are not official park and not grass as there are some trees as well. Typically a small areas in the city between apartment buildings. These areas are not official parks, gardens or grass. It is just a green accessible for everoyne. So we can say it is a *public* or *common* green.
So question is, how to tag it? There is also tag landuse=village_green [2], but I don't like the word "village" there and as well, there are plans to remove it, because it has the same issue as leisure=common. On landuse=village_green wiki, there is a nice sentence: *Such use of the tag is incorrect, and a better tagging for these situations needs to be defined.* So is the right time to do it now? What tag/tags we should use for such pieces of green that are too small or to be a park, are not a garden and are public accessible. What about e.g.: landuse=public_green? It could be also extended by tags like trees=yes, scrub=yes or public_green=grass / public_green=flowers. What do you think? Some better idea? Thanks, Marián [1] https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/commit/4df96c4e4927c 3e029b31e34c0cf1be2dda6f637 [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dvillage_green
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging