Mar 5, 2019, 11:48 AM by s...@smz.it: > > Hi! > > On 2019-03-05 11:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> >> Mar 5, 2019, 9:00 AM by >> mky...@email.cz <mailto:mky...@email.cz>>> : >> >>> Typically a small areas in the city between apartment buildings. >>> These areas are not official parks, gardens or grass. It is just a >>> green accessible for everoyne. So we can say it is a *public* or >>> *common* green. >>> >> So far I usually tagged such places as follows: >> >> Made sure that it is within landuse=residential (as it is a >> residential area) >> Mapped physical features (leisure=playground, natural=tree, >> landuse=grass, highway=footway etc) >> > > Is it land> use> =grass or land> cover> =grass? I tend to agree with > Alessandro Sarretta who uses landcover... > > landcover=grass also would be fine in this case, but meaning of this tags is the same and landuse=grass is more popular > > I also have doubts about leisure=playground as it is not a physical > feature but it describe the usage done of that space, not its > characteristics. > > I use leisure=playground solely for cases where it clearly describes a physical feature Something like https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aire_de_jeux_en_2017_(20).jpg <https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aire_de_jeux_en_2017_(20).jpg> I am not advocating for entire to be tagged as playground, just parts that are playgrounds (the same with natural=tree, landuse=grass, highway=footway - such things should be tagged only where this features are) > Also that very same space could be used for different things (> fairs, > concerts, rallies, etc.> ) at different times... > Sounds like landuse=recreation_ground or leisure=park to me.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
