On 13 August 2018 at 07:36, Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12. Aug 2018, at 23:30, Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > In cases when only official vehicles (National Parks, Water supply etc) > are allowed, I've always called that vehicles=no, working on " *no* – No > access for the general public."? > > If there are people who can access, you should prefer “private” over no. > > IMHO we should remove “for the general public” in the above definition. > Where did you find this sentence? > Map features page for restrictions https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Restrictions, but teh same definition is also listed on the "Allowed access" field for any road eg https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/-28.07754/153.42441, & also on the key:access wiki page https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
