On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: > For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. Awkward but > correct.
This is of course incorrect, lanes = 0 (or just do not mention it) and bicycle:lanes:forward=yes|yes (or designated|designated) and something similar for backward. > Op za 12 mei 2018 23:16 schreef Paul Johnson <[email protected]>: >> >> On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 3:01 PM, Marc Gemis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Why do you keep taggig roads if you know the wiki tells you not to >>> count cycle lanes? >> >> >> The wiki doesn't mesh with the real world on this issue. >> >> How is this lanes=0 and not lanes=2? >> >> https://imgur.com/gallery/3C3lHbj >> >> How is this lanes=2 and not lanes=4? >> >> >> http://www.oregonlive.com/cycling/index.ssf/2013/10/hawthorne_bridge_gets_new_bike.html >> >> What now? >> >> >> https://nacto.org/wp-content/uploads/gallery/bicycleboulevard_offsetcrossing_rendering/offset_crossings3.jpg >> >> I'm sure this fits the wiki's idea of the world and doesn't give cyclists >> bad lane advice at all. >> >> >> https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a3/76/c2/a376c2693250554476060fc87b00be9f.jpg >> >> All involved would probably appreciate advanced warning of this example of >> what's on the ground being stupid. >> >> >> https://systemicfailure.wordpress.com/2016/09/28/dangerous-double-right-turn-in-fremont/ >> >> It's not just the US doing stuff like this. >> >> https://tinlizzieridesagain.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/100_8603.jpg >> >> Christchurch, NZ actually suggests this: >> >> >> http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SPHHygdFnRA/UwCbqrLXfoI/AAAAAAAARMA/yPT4ic1zTqw/s1600/christchurchmadjunction.jpg >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
