On Sun, May 13, 2018, 00:37 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. >
This literally doesn't add up. Also, that's a shoulder on the right, Tulsa screwed up and used white paint for the centerline. Awkward but correct. But as said before, the lanes tag is pretty useless > beside some simple, straightforward street layouts, for even number of > total lanes evenly divided in both directions. Lanes=3 is useless, not? > No! That tag makes it easy to find a tagging error further down. There's a good reason validators choke when the forward, backward and both_ways lanes don't total the lane count. Editors set this automatically, validators throw errors for on this because that idea is brick to the head, physically induced brain trauma, short-bus riding special. So once again, define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag, or use it as > it is defined now. Do not change its meaning. > I'm not, the wiki is. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
