May I kindly ask my fellow mappers to come back to my initial question about tagging of oneway cycle lanes? I would like to get an amswer without changing the existing tagging schemes for lanes.
Thanks in advance On 13 May 2018 at 16:30, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13, 2018, 00:37 Marc Gemis <marc.ge...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> For your first image lanes=0, lanes:forward=2, lanes:backward=1. >> > > This literally doesn't add up. Also, that's a shoulder on the right, Tulsa > screwed up and used white paint for the centerline. > > Awkward but correct. But as said before, the lanes tag is pretty useless >> beside some simple, straightforward street layouts, for even number of >> total lanes evenly divided in both directions. Lanes=3 is useless, not? >> > > No! That tag makes it easy to find a tagging error further down. There's > a good reason validators choke when the forward, backward and both_ways > lanes don't total the lane count. Editors set this automatically, > validators throw errors for on this because that idea is brick to the head, > physically induced brain trauma, short-bus riding special. > > So once again, define a new tag or do not use the lanes tag, or use it >> as it is defined now. Do not change its meaning. >> > > I'm not, the wiki is. > >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
